Warning: Contents May Be Hot

The Case of Rihanna’s Revealing Fashion Sense

As of late, pop star Rihanna has been really pushing the boundaries in terms of her fashion choices.  The ‘issue’?  She hardly ever wears anything at all. The latest example is the sheer see-through gown that she wore to a recent fashion awards show, where she was being honoured.  The gown, shown below, left her boobs and butt and back almost completely exposed.

So, are Rihanna’s exhibitionist tendencies an issue? Are they a marketing ploy, or an actual representation of how Rihanna likes to portray herself on her body.

Does it matter?

I recently read an editorial piece put out by the Independent panning Rihanna for her choices.  The amount of shade being thrown in the article is totally off the charts.  I understand questioning how Rihanna is portraying herself to her legions of young fans, but this article goes way overboard with the criticism and ends up sounding petty.

Here are the choice quotes from the article,

“Leaving absolutely nothing to the imagination, the only thing Rihanna risked in that outfit was catching the flu.

Rihanna, so fond of risqué dress, is using her body to cling on to her career – as are her management. She has a fine voice, but that’s not what’s being used to sell her. She is a beautiful girl who looks great naked so she’s being marketed like a soft porn star instead of a musical artist.” 

The author goes on to throw offhanded digs at Miley Cyrus, before championing Rumor Willis for her recent ‘feminist statement’ that involved her walking around topless on the streets of New York.  Perhaps Willis’ statement was more ‘overtly feminist’ but it doesn’t seem any different in that it was a cry for publicity and exposure.

Source: piximus.net via Q RE on Sex.com

Do we really think that Willis, an aspiring model, wasn’t aware that walking around topless as a celebrity would land her on the pages of TMZ and any other celebrity rag?  Is she really contributing something substantial to a feminist movement simply because she claims association?

Wouldn’t a more feminist statement be allowing women to dress how they want, regardless of how much of their body is exposed?  The author implies that Rihanna is simply a cog in the machine, being directed by patriarchy and the music industry, but is there anything explicit confirming that she is in that position, and that Rumour Willis isn’t?  This simply seems like the case of an author grasping for straws, trying to look for statements where they don’t exist.

Let Ri Ri be Ri Ri, let her dress how she wants.  Miley is brash and loud, does that make her a soft-core pornstar? Even if it does, is there anything inherently wrong or un-feminist about being a pornstar?  This article just seems to be completely mired in right-wing conservative old-school rhetoric, and I don’t get this at all.

via Independent

2 Responses to “The Case of Rihanna’s Revealing Fashion Sense”

  1. Elphie Wellerstein

    Well put! While we all have different ideas of what “feminism” means to us, bashing other women who have power in the publicity world is not helping the cause! I think people have a problem with Rhianna’s outfits and Rumor Willis’ boobs because people are still afraid of free-thinking women who go against traditional, sexist stereotypes. Just because something is labeled as a publicity stunt doesn’t mean that it came from a bad place! Starting conversations about women’s rights to do what they want with their bodies is extremely important!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: