Warning: Contents May Be Hot

The Line Between Non-Pornographic and Pornographic Modelling

There’s a certain line that exists, and its probably completely arbitrary, and definitely very blurred, but it does exist: the line that crosses you over from being a model who does some nudity, into being a model who does porn.  But what is that line?  Does it even matter?

What is fashion porn?  I used to think: the line is pretty simple.  If it shows tasteful partial nudity (boobs) it qualifies as non-pornographic, and might appear in the pages of your Vogues and your Vanity Fairs. Several years ago, a photo shoot showing boobs was still a rarity, a risque decision to print in your pages, and one that would sell copies.

Now, however, the line is almost completely blurred.  Almost every fashion magazine you pick up has boobs in it.  It’s now the norm, and its no longer exciting.  I’m not sure what signalled this shift in what’s considered safe to be printed.  Maybe its the proliferation of nudity on the internet?  Maybe its magazines feeling like they have to adapt to our modern times to stay relevant and in-business?

Source: mrcapetown.co.za via PurpleFilth on Sex.com

Naw – since magazines have become on the verge of extinction, we’ve seen big mainstream fashion rags slowly (or quickly!) declining.  On the other hand, there’s been a huge surge of underground, glossy, expensive fashion magazines that have full editorial control over their content. In an effort to keep up with these new upstarts, the big rags have been forced to adapt and mimic their content.  That’s why we are starting to see more and more boobs, fashion porn and even full frontals!

I think its totally fine to display the human body on an artistic canvas, but with this new-found embracing of sexuality comes issues: what about all of the models and people that are uncomfortable engaging in this style of photo shoot?

Case in point this model named Maria Belen Rodriguez, who has been waging a legal war against search engines because her name has been associated with pornographic search results.  Of course, she doesn’t REALLY have a leg to stand on, but the point remains: as the lines between fashion, modelling, erotica, and hardcore pornography continue to be blurred, we’ll continue to see issues like these arise.

I mean, how long before we see Hustler style pin-ups of ladies spreading their hoo-has in the middle of Vogue? Seem outlandish?  What if its the only way to save their empire, would it be so outlandish then?



2 Responses to “The Line Between Non-Pornographic and Pornographic Modelling”

  1. Naive Nancy

    or is it a sign of something else that is becoming more worldly and less americanized. only americans see nudity as something shameful and that is generally reflected in our media of all types.

    • theundiedrawer

      Very good point actually. One of the most enlightening quotes I’ve heard recently, by the band Pussy Riot who was wrongfully imprisoned by the Russian Government:
      “Russians are afraid of the word ‘Riot,’ but Americans are afraid of the word ‘Pussy.’


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: